Petitioner approaching under Art. 226 alleging matter decided by coordinate bench. Court closed proceedings directing filing of comprehensive representation with specified order copy. Respondents directed to decide within four weeks.
Directorction to file comprehensive representation; Direction to respondents to decide within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 8161/2018
Vikas Meena S/o Mul Chand Meena, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Near Manji Well, Ward No. 15, Sardarshahar, Churu (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Shukla For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
16/04/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application is no more res-integra in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 15668/2012 : Monika Meel v. The Deputy Director, Secondary
Education, Jaipur & Ors ., vide order dated 3.10.2012.
It is further contended that the petitioner, at this stage,
would be satisfied if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address, within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address
(2 of 2)
[CW-8161/2018]
a comprehensive representation, enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Monika Meel (supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed, within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible; however, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the
writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/187
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ application, being not res integra in light of a coordinate bench judgment, can be disposed off with directions to file a representation.
Whether respondents can be directed to decide the petitioner's representation within a specified timeframe.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Monika Meel v. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Jaipur & Ors.Referred¶14
S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 15668/2012 : Monika Meel v. The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Jaipur & Ors.
Vikas Meena
State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government, Education Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur
Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner
District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Churu (Rajasthan)
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
