Disposed

Sohan Lal Verma v. Chairman R S R T C and Ors.

Rajasthan HC13 Apr 2018CW/7989/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order closes a writ application by directing the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation. The State-respondents were directed to consider and decide the representation via a reasoned order within four weeks, granting the benefit of a coordinate bench decision if applicable.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to address representation; direction to respondents to decide within four weeks via reasoned order.

Sohan Lal Verma Vs Chairman R S R T C and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 7989/2018

¶3

Sohan Lal Verma S/o Shri Baxi Ram Verma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. 61, 62, Bajrang Vihar Colony, Jaitpura, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Retired As Assistant Administrative Officer, Vaishali Nagar Depot, Rsrtc, Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶7

The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.

¶8

The Chief Manager, Rsrtc, Vaishali Nagar Depot, Jaipur.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) :

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶12

Order

¶13

13/04/2018

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ applications lead case being S. B. Civil Writ petition Number 14748/2014: Prahlad Singh Versus The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors., decided on 28^th September, 2015.

¶15

It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two

(2 of 2)

[CW-7989/2018]

weeks hereinafter.

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Prahlad Singh (supra).

¶20

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶21

In case, claim of the petitioners is found covered by the adjudication aforesaid in the case of Prahlad Singh (supra), the petitioners be also accorded the same benefit.

¶22

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶23

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶24

SS/156

Sohan Lal Verma v. Chairman R S R T C and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohan Lal Verma v. Chairman R S R T C and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murlidhar Raigar Vs Director Secondary Education and Anr.

Rakesh Lal Meena and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Reena Joshi Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Ram Lal Meena and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Mahaveer Prasad Gurjar and Ors. Vs State Rural Develp and Panchayati Ors.

Smt Sarita Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.