Bharti Sharma Vs State Education Department Ors.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the Staterespondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame, which the petitioner is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶15

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents ventilating grievances raised herein.

¶16

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-3521/2018]

¶19

possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶20

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶21

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶22

SS/56

Bharti Sharma v. State Education Department Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharti Sharma v. State Education Department Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Laxman Singh and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Babu Lal Meena Vs State Agriculture Depanr

Sahab Singh Vs State Education Department Ors.

Babli Gupta Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Parsa Ram Vs State Education Department Ors.