Writ petition allowed to quash and set aside the order passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge on the ground of factual error regarding the venue of the arbitration award. Court directed the concerned judge to rehear objections.
Quashed and set aside the order dated 19/09/2017; directed re-hearing of objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 349 / 2018
----Petitioners
Versus
Minerals and Metals Ltd. (MMTC) Through Authorised Signatory, Office At Core-1, Scope Complex, 7, Lodhi Road, New Delhi. Branch Office At Arihant Towers, Second, Near Central Jail, Agra Road, Jaipur Through The General Manager.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
17/01/2018
the ground that the arbitration award was passed at Delhi and the arbitration proceedings have been decided at Delhi.
(2 of 3)
[CW-349/2018]
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)J.
Raghu/42
(3 of 3)
[CW-349/2018]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Additional District & Sessions Judge failed to keep in view relevant material to return the main plea of the defendants that the arbitration award as Annexure-2 of the order impugned was p
Whether the noted error committed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge in the order dated 19/09/2017 calls for quashing the same.
Mithilesh Rawat W/o Sh. Radha Govind Rawat
Radha Govind Rawat S/o Sh. Madanlal Ji
Minerals and Metals Ltd. (MMTC)
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
