Disposed

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2018CW/298/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with copies of two precedent orders regarding transfer and posting. The State respondents were directed to consider the submission within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to submit representation within two weeks; direction to State to decide within six weeks. Application disposed.

Mahesh Kumar Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 298 / 2018

¶3

Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Oumkar, by Caste Gurjar, Aged About 36 Years, Resident of Village Santhalpur, Post Neemuchana, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Presently Posted As a Teacher Grad-III, Level-II At Government Girls Upper Primary School Bajwas, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Elementary Education, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶7

The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶8

District Education Officer (Elementary), Nagaur.

¶9

Block Elementary Education Officer Parbatsar, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi

¶12

For Respondent(s) :

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶14

Order

¶15

09/01/2018

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the

¶17

controversy raised in the instant writ application is with reference to transfer and posting and at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner within a time frame in the backdrop of adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Bhagwana Ram Versus State & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 6272/2016, decided on 24^th August, 2016.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-298/2018]

¶20

Referring to another order made in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 12450/2016 (Harishankar Verma Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.), disposed off on 3^rd October, 2016, learned counsel would submit that the State-respondents therein were directed to consider the representation with reference to mutual transfer or transfer on the ground of illness and in the eventuality where the vacancies existed without any compromise on administrative exigency.

¶21

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing the copies of the orders in the cases of Bhagwana Ram and Harishankar Verma (supra), within two weeks hereinafter.

¶22

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶23

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶24

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶25

Pooja/99

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Kumar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Sahuni Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Surajnarain Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Shri Shaitan Singh Vs State

Taufik Khan @ Dhanpat Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Sonu Kanwar Rathore Vs State Women and Child Development Ors.