Dismissed
Arjun Ram v. State and Ors.
Rajasthan HCCW/2645/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a one-line order where the High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning or legal propositions.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Civil Writ No. 2645/2018
¶3
Arjun Ram Son Of Shri Ramu Ram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Beniwalo Ki Dhani, Post Kurchi, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur.
¶4
----Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
- The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
¶7
- The District Collector, Nagaur.
¶8
- Zila Parishad, Nagaur Through Its Chief Executive Officer 4. Zila Parishad, Nagaur, Through Its Addl Chief Executive Officer.
¶9
- Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Khinvsar, District Nagaur.
¶10
- Gram Panchayat Biloka, District Nagaur, Through Its Sarpanch.
¶11
----Respondents
¶12
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Ripudaman Singh. Mr. Pukhraj Jangid. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. K.S. Solanki for |
| Mr. Manish Patel, AGC. |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Arjun Ram Son Of Shri Ramu Ram
- respondent
The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Department
- respondent
The District Collector, Nagaur
- respondent
Zila Parishad, Nagaur Through Its Chief Executive Officer
- respondent
Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Khinvsar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2645/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court