Disposed

Sajjan Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC14 Dec 2018CW/179/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of connected writ petitions regarding appointment as Gram Panchayat Sahayaks. The petitioners were directed to submit individual representations to a committee within 10 days. No appointments were made pending disposal of these representations.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners set at liberty to submit individual representations to the jurisdictional committee within 10 days; no appointments to be made pending disposal.

Sajjan Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.179/2018

¶3

Sajjan Singh S/o Shri Ramkumar Singh, aged about 41 years, R/o Village Silarpuri, Post Ghardana Kalan, District Jhunjhunu

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Depart, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

District Collector Cum District Magistrate, Jhunjhunu

¶9

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jhunjhunu

¶10

District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jhunjhunu

¶11

Paden Panchayat Elementary Education Officer P.e.e.o. Cum Principal Cum Chairman School Developmen, Ardawata Kalan, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

Connected With

¶14

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17337/2017

¶15

Neha Sharma W/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Sharma, aged about 23 years, Resident Of Village/post Khedla Joshi Ki Kothi, Teh. Lawan, District Dausa Raj.

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Go, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶19

Principal Secretary Department Of School Education, Govt. Of Raj., Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶20

Director Elementary Education Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶21

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dausa.

¶22

Panchayat Elementary Education Officer P.e.e.o Cum Principal Cum Chairman School Development Manag, Hingotiya, Lawan, District Dausa Raj.

(2 of 3)

[CW-179/2018]

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.D.K. Bhardwaj. For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.K. Gupta, AAG.

¶27

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA

¶28

Order

¶29

14/12/2018

¶30

Counsel for the parties agree that the issue in these writ petitions is covered by the judgment of this court in the case of Sushma & Anr. Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B Civil Writ Petition No. 22659/2017; decided on 1-12-2018) and other connected matters.

¶31

In view of fair concession of counsel for the parties, the order of this court in the case of Sushma & Anr. Versus The State of Rajasthan (supra) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case of the petitioners.

¶32

Accordingly I would dispose of these petitions setting the petitioners at liberty to submit their individual representation alongwith supporting documents to the jurisdictional committee constituted in terms of the judgment passed by the Principal Seat of this Court in the case of Malu Ram Versus State of Rajasthan (SBCWP No. 4374/2018) comprised of District Collector as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and DEO as member within 10 days from today. Each petitioner should ventilate his/her/their grievance in the individual representation to the Committee.

¶33

In the event of the aforesaid representation alongwith supporting documents being filed by each of the petitioner within

¶34

(3 of 3) [CW-179/2018]

¶35

10 days from today, the Committee is directed to dispose of the representation within three weeks of its receipt strictly in terms of the guidelines formulated by the concerned SDMC for appointment of Gram Panchayat Sahayaks. Till disposal of the representation/s now to be filed by each of the petitioner pursuant to the court’s order, no appointment to the post of Gram Panchayat Sahayak in respective Gram Panchayat shall be made by extension / renewal of subsisting contract, as directed by the Principal Seat of this Court in the case of Malu Ram Versus State of Rajasthan (supra).

¶36

These petitions stand disposed of accordingly. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in each

¶37

connected petition.

¶38

(ALOK SHARMA),J

¶39

Karan/122-123

Sajjan Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajjan Singh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mausam Meena Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Gambheer Singh Son of Shri Mool Chand Fauzdar Vs State of Rajasthan through Its Secretary

Ajay Kumar Son of Gopi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through Its Secretary

Gyarasi Lal Choudhary Vs State Panchayati Raj Ors.

Dinesh Singh Raghav Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Shashi Kant Sharma Vs State Panchayati Raj Ors.