The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The court held that since an interim order had been issued restraining the Municipality from allotting stalls, the petition challenging the subsequent advertisement had become meaningless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ No. 16868/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sumit Singhal For Respondent(s) : None
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
11/12/2018
(2 of 2)
[CW-16868/2018]
temporary stalls for storage and sale of fire-crackers in the residential area.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
18-Kshama Dixit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the advertisement for fire cracker stall allotment required adjudication given the issuance of an interim order.
Dinesh Kumar Jain
Pankaj Gittani
Bhanwar Lal Ranka
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Udaipur
State Of Rajasthan
Praadeep Nandrajog
Pusphendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
