Allowed

Geetika Choudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Oct 2018CW/14771/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed this writ petition following Komal Purohit v. State of Rajasthan. The petitioner holding graduation with English as a compulsory subject was declared eligible for appointment as Teacher Grade-III (Level-2) for English and directed to be dealt with appropriately.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed similar relief to Komal Purohit; respondents directed to treat petitioner as eligible for Teacher Grade-III (Level-2) in English and appoint accordingly.

Geetika Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ No. 14771/2018

¶3

Geetika Choudhary D/o Sh. Suresh Choudhary W/o Sh. Surendra Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, V.p.o. Gudia Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Principal Secretary Education Department (Elementary), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director/commissoner Elementary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶9

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Barmer.

¶10

District Education Officer (Elementary), District Barmer.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Purohit for Mr. Sushil Bishnoi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dinesh Ojha for Mr. P.R. Singh, AAG.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶14

Order

¶15

29/10/2018

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment of this Court Komal Purohit v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13707/2018 , decided on 12.10.2018, wherein, this Court has directed as under:-

¶17

“In view of the above discussion, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed. The respondents are directed to treat the petitioners, who have done their graduation with subject English as compulsory subject as eligible for

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-14771/2018]

¶20

Teacher Grade-III (Level-2) for subject-English and deal with their candidature pursuant to the advertisement dated 31.07.2018 appropriately and if they stand in merit and are otherwise eligible, grant them appointment in accordance with their merit.

¶21

All determinations made by the respondents contrary to the above directions, shall stand quashed and set aside.”

¶22

In view of the above, the petitioner stand on similar footing with that of Komal Purohit (supra), the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed with similar relief as granted in the case of

¶23

Komal Purohit (quoted supra).

¶24

(ARUN BHANSALI)J.

¶25

Rm/28

Geetika Choudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Geetika Choudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Magraj Jain Vs Dinesh Kumar and Ors.

Meenakshi Vs State of Rajasthan through Its Secretary

Pushpa Parmar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sangeeta Vs State of Rajasthan

Kunal Kumar Vs Rrvpnl Jaipur and Ors.