A single-bench order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous because the Division Bench in Mahant Budharam Chela had already decided the matter. No substantive issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13494 / 2013
Paras Mal
----Petitioner
Versus
The Additional Civil Judge & Ors.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Gehlot on behalf of Mr. Om Mehta
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Avin Chhangani
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/04/2018
Counsel for the parties agree that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous in view of order passed by Hon`ble Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.824/2008 (Mahant Budharam Chela Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.), decided on 10.07.2017.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
Sanjay
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mahant Budharam Chela Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.Followed¶13
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.824/2008 (Mahant Budharam Chela Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.)
Paras Mal
The Additional Civil Judge & Ors.
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
