Disposed

Smt Kanchan Grover v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC17 Jul 2018CW/13218/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the State respondents to consider the petitioner's representation regarding transfer and posting within two weeks, provided she submits copies of referenced prior orders within the same period. A reasoned decision must be made within six weeks of receipt.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation within two weeks; State respondents directed to consider and decide within six weeks.

Smt Kanchan Grover Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 13218/2018

¶3

Smt. Kanchan Grover W/o Shri Pradeep Grover , R/o 12-A Jyoti Nagar, Manwa Khera, Sector-4, Girwa, Shastri Circle, Udaipur Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Education , Secretariat, Jaipur Raj

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education , Bikaner Raj.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Secondary Education , Udaipur Raj

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) :

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶12

Order

¶13

17/07/2018

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the controversy raised in the instant writ application is with reference to transfer and posting and at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner within a time frame in the backdrop of adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Bhagwana Ram Versus State & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 6272/2016, decided on 24^th August, 2016.

¶15

Referring to another order made in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

¶16

Number 12450/2016 (Harishankar Verma Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.), disposed off on 3^rd October, 2016, learned

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-13218/2018]

¶19

counsel would submit that the State-respondents therein were

¶20

directed to consider the representation with reference to mutual transfer or transfer on the ground of illness and in the eventuality where the vacancies existed without any compromise on administrative exigency.

¶21

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing the copies of the orders in the cases of Bhagwana Ram and Harishankar Verma (supra), within two weeks hereinafter.

¶22

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶23

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶24

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶25

SS/140

Smt Kanchan Grover v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Kanchan Grover v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lata Choudhary D/O Shri Kripal Singh Choudhary W/O Shri Laxmi Narain Choudhary, Vs State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary

Subhash Bajiya Andanr Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Anita Kumari Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Satyendra Singh Awana Vs State Rural Develp and Panchayati Ors.

Suresh Chand Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Sangeeta Lohiya Vs R P S C Ajmer and Ors.