Jagmal Ram v. Bhura Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
Single bench writ petition challenging the rejection of an Order VII Rule 14 application to produce a certified court order. It noted for quashing the lower court order and allowed the application.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order rejected on incorrect grounds was quashed; Order VII Rule 14 application allowed; certified order dated 15.05.2017 to be taken on record.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 12791/2018
- Jagmal Ram S/o Late Shri Khanga Ram, Aged About 66 Years, By Caste Vishnoi, Village Mansagar, Tehsil Earlier Sub-Tehsil Tinwari And Now Bawadi, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
- Babu Ram S/o Late Shri Khanga Ram, Aged About 55 Years, By Caste Vishnoi, Village Mansagar, Tehsil Earlier Sub-Tehsil Tinwari And Now Bawadi, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
- Mohan Ram S/o Late Shri Budha Ram, Aged About 45 Years, By Caste Vishnoi, Village Mansagar, Tehsil Earlier Sub-Tehsil Tinwari And Now Bawadi, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
- Papu Ram S/o Late Shri Budha Ram, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Vishnoi, Village Mansagar, Tehsil Earlier Sub-Tehsil Tinwari And Now Bawadi, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
- Bhura Ram S/o Late Shri Saroopram, By Caste Vishnoi, Village Dawara, Tehsil Earlier Sub-Tehsil Tinwari And Now Bawadi, District Jodhpur
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Order VII Rule 14 application was impugned order was rejected for irrelevant reasons?
Should a document from the same proceedings need to be taken on record via Order VII Rule 14?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JAGMAL RAM
- petitioner
BABU RAM
- petitioner
MOHAN RAM
- petitioner
PAPU RAM
- respondent
BHURA RAM
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/12791/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court