Disposed

Nand Kishore Sharma and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC18 Jul 2018CW/12109/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition regarding seniority and promotion was closed with a direction for petitioners to submit a comprehensive representation. The court directed respondents to decide the representation by a reasoned order within three months of receipt.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to submit comprehensive representation. State-respondents to decide it by reasoned order within three months.

Nand Kishore Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 12109/2018

¶3

Nand Kishore Sharma S/o Sh. Bajrang Lal Sharma , R/o 40 Jai Hanuman Colony, District Tonk, Rajasthan

¶4

Kishan Lal Jat S/o Shri Dugalal Jat , R/o Dhauli Darwaza Ke Pass, Post Diggi, District Malpura, Rajasthan

¶5

Ganesh Narayan Sharma S/o Sita Ram Sharma , R/o Village Motipura, Post Chosala, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan

¶6

Khemraj Jangid S/o Jagdish Prasad Jangid , R/o 62 Yadav Mohalla, Village Arniya, Post Chainpura, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary Education Department , Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan

¶10

The Director, Primary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan

¶11

The District Education Officer Primary , Tonk, Rajasthan

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) :

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶15

Order

¶16

18/07/2018

¶17

Counsel for the petitioners submits that for the matter is with reference to seniority and promotion, hence, the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame, which the petitioners are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-12109/2018]

¶20

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents ventilating grievances raised in the writ application.

¶21

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶22

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶23

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J

¶24

SS/53

Nand Kishore Sharma and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nand Kishore Sharma and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyendra Singh Awana Vs State Rural Develp and Panchayati Ors.

Suresh Chand Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Sangeeta Lohiya Vs R P S C Ajmer and Ors.

Karunesh Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Shyam Lal Tiwari Andors Vs State Education Dep Ors.

Smt Mithilesh Kumari Gupta Vs University of Raj