Disposed

Balram Yadav and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2018CW/11465/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition noting that the controversy was resolved by a Coordinate Bench and the Supreme Court. It directed petitioners to submit a comprehensive representation within two weeks for the State to decide.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to file comprehensive representation within two weeks; State directed to decide within eight weeks.

Balram Yadav and Ors. Vs State of Raj and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writs No. 11465/2018

Balram Yadav & Ors.

----Petitioners

Versus

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶7

----Respondents

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) :

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶10

Order

¶11

02/07/2018

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ applications lead case being S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 15098 of 2012: Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 2^nd November, 2016.

¶13

It is further contended that the matter has also attained the finality in view of the order dated 21^st September, 2016, made by the Apex Court of the land declining Civil Appeal Number 11356 of 2013 and other connected appeals, institute by the Staterespondents.

¶14

It is further urged that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners, in the backdrop of the adjudication made by this Court as well as Supreme Court in the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CW-11465/2018]

¶17

case of Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union (supra), within a time frame, which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶18

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union (supra).

¶19

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order in the backdrop of the adjudication made by this Court as well as Supreme Court in the case of Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union (supra), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶20

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶21

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶22

SS/247

Balram Yadav and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balram Yadav and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwaan Singh Katara and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Punam Chand Maida and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Roop Chand Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Sumitra Meghwal Vs Rpsc

Ram Singh Shekhawat Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Surendra Singh Gurjar Vs Union of India and Ors.