In a limited prayer regarding the Hanumangarh Master Plan 2017-2035 draft, the High Court directed respondents to objectively consider petitioner objections and pass a speaking order on feasibility.
Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's objections and pass a speaking order on the Hanumangarh Master Plan 2017-2035 draft.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 11235/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
(2 of 2)
[CW-11235/2018]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Dr. AA Bhansali For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/08/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to objectively consider the objections and suggestions made by the petitioner while finalising the draft of Hanumangarh Master Plan 2017-2035.
In light of such submission, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to objectively consider the objections and suggestions made by the petitioner while finalising the draft of Hanumangarh Master Plan 2017-2035 and pass a speaking order while seeing the feasibility of such proposals.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
sudheer
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State and Municipal Council must objectively consider petitioner's objections to the Hanumangarh Master Plan draft.
Nirmala Devi
Praveen Kumar
Bhagwan Das
Mahendra Pal
Raman Kumar
The State Of Rajasthan
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
