Drop to Stay Application filed against S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.125/2017. The High Court restrained the respondents from alienating the property in question during the pendency of the appeal and disposed of the application.
Restrained respondents from alienating the property during the pendency of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No.637/2017
In
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.125/2017
Vishnu Dutt Sharma
----Appellant
Versus
Ramhet And Anr
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Inder Raj Saini
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA
Order
02/05/2018
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and to the impugned judgment and decreed, the respondents are restrained from alienating the property in question during the pendency of this appeal.
Application stands disposed of.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
Sanjay Gaur/51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents be restrained from alienating the property during the pendency of the appeal.
Vishnu Dutt Sharma
Ramhet And Anr
Prakash Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
