Dismissed

Abdul Kayyum and Ors. v. Mohammad Yakub and Anr.

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2018CSA/510/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was an appeal against a High Court order maintaining 33% of monthly income as temporary alimony. Some NRI respondents contended the quantum was insufficient. The Supreme Court held that the quantum was reasonable, no further evidence was needed, and dismissed the NRI's application for remand.

What did the court decide?

Application for remand or increase in quantum of maintenance dismissed. Pending amount of Rs. 100,000/- awarded to the wife.

Abdul Kayyum and Ors. Vs Mohammad Yakub and Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj ,dyihB nhokuh f}rh; vihy l[;ka &510@2017

¶3

1- vCnqy d¸;we iq= eksgEen v¸;wc] tkfr eqlyeku] tfj, ikWoj vkWQ ,VksuhZ gksYMj ethn pkS/kjh] mez yxHkx 35 o"kZ iq= vCnqy d;~;we] tkfr eqlyeku] fuoklh cktkj la[;k&2] jkexat e.Mh] ftyk dksVkA

¶4

¶5

Jherh 'kehe ckuks iq=h eksgEen v¸;wc] tkfr eqlyeku

¶6

3- Jherh lkftnk ckuks iRuh Jh eksgEen v¸;wc] tkfr eqlyeku

¶7

4- fu'kjFk iq=h ¼LoxhZ; v[rj ckuks iq=h eksgEen v¸;wc½ lHkh fuoklh cktkj uacj&2] jkexate.Mh] ftyk dksVk A

&% cuke %&

1- eksgEen ;kdwc iq= eksgEen v¸;wc] tkfr eqlyeku] fuoklh gkmflax cksMZ dkWyksuh] jkexate.Mh] ftyk dksVk A

¶11

2- eksgEen vkfcn iq= eksgEen v¸;wc] tkfr eqlyeku] fuoklh cktkj la[;k &2] jkexate.Mh] ftyk dksVk] orZeku gkmflax cksMZ dkWyksuh] jkexate.Mh] ftyk dksVkA

¶12

&&&izR;[email protected]

¶13

fu.kZ; fnukad%& 02-07-2018

¶14

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk

¶15

mifLFkr%&
vf/koDrk okLrs vihykFkhZ	%& Jh	eqds'k pkSgku okLrs
	Jh	vCny dyke [kku
vf/koDrk okLrs izR;FkhZ	%&	q

¶16

¶17

1- [email protected] }kjk ;g flfoy f}rh; vihy U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] jkexate.Mh] ftyk dksVk ¼ftls bl fu.kZ; esa vkxs vihyh; U;k;ky; lacksf/kr fd;k tkosxk½ }kjk nhokuh fu;fer vihy la[;k 07@2014 esa ikfjr fMdzh o fu.kZ; fnukad 09-05-2017 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ftlds }kjk vihyh; U;k;ky; us izfroknhx.k@ vihykFkhZx.k dh vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dj fopkj.k U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ¼o-[k-½ jkexate.Mh] ftyk dksVk }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukad 25-08-2014 dks la'kksf/kr dj oknh la[;k 1 ls 3 dks fookfnr lEifÙk esa feyus okys fgLls dk iqufuZ/kkZj.k fd;k gS A

¶18

2- vihy ls lacaf/kr rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj of.kZr fd, tk ldrs gSa fd erd eksgEen v¸;wc ds edku ds foHkktu dk okn oknh us izfroknhx.k ds fo:) izLrqr fd;k Fkk A fufoZokfnr :i ls oknh@izR;FkhZ la[;k 1 eksgEen ;kdwc o izfroknh la[;k 1 vCnqy d;we o izfroknh la[;k &2 eksgEen vkfcn erd eksgEen v¸;wc ds iq= o izfroknh la[;k 3@1 'kehe ckuks o 3@2 lkftnk ckuks iqf=;ka gSa A fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us fookfnr edku esa oknh o izfroknh la[;k 1 o 2 izR;sd dk 1@4 fgLlk o izfroknh la[;k 3@1 o izfroknh la[;k 3@2 izR;sd dk 1@8&1@8 fgLlk gksuk fu.khZr fd;k FkkA ftlds fo:) dh xbZ izFke vihy dks vihyh; U;k;ky; us vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj djrs gq, oknh rFkk izfroknh la[;k&1 o 2 izR;sd dk fookfnr laifRr esa 1@4 ds LFkku ij izR;sd dk 2@9 fgLlk gksuk o izfroknh la[;k 3@1 o izfroknh la[;k 3@2 izR;sd dk 1@8 ds LFkku ij izR;sd dk 1@6 fgLlk gksuk fu.khZr fd;k gS] ftlds fo:) ;g f}rh; vihy gS A

¶19

3- bl vihy ij ;ksX; vf/koDRkk vihykFkhZ dks lquk x;k A

¶20

4- ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us vihyh; U;k;ky; us ftl izdkj oknh o izfroknh la[;k 1 o 2 o 3@1 o 3@2 dk fookfnr laifRr esa fgLlk gksuk iqufuZ/kkZfjr fd;k gS mls dksbZ pqukSrh vihy dh cgl ds le; ugha nh gS A

¶21

¶22

mudk dsoy ek= ;g dFku gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izfroknh la[;k 2 dks 200@& :i;s U;k;'kqYd vnk djus dk tks vkns'k fn;k gS og fof/kd :i ls =qfViw.kZ gS A izfroknh la[;k 2 us dksbZ dkmUVj Dyse ugha fd;k Fkk ] vr% dksbZ U;k;'kqYd ns; ugha Fkk A bl fcUnq ij ;g vihy lquok;h gsrq xzg.k dh tkos A

¶23

5- ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k ds dFkuksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn o laiw.kZ vfHkys[k dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu o ifj'khyu djus ds ckn ;g U;k;ky; mDr rdZ esa dksbZ lkj ugha ikrh gS pwafd izFke rks ,slk dksbZ vk/kkj u rks bl f}rh; vihy esa fy;k x;k gS vkSj u izFke vihy ds le; gh ;g vkifÙk mBkbZ xbZ FkhA f}rh; bl lEcU/k esa izfroknh la[;k 2 }kjk dksbZ vihy ugha dh xbZ gSA

¶24

6- bl f}rh; vihy esa fof/k dk dksbZ iz'u ;k fof/k dk dksbZ lkjHkwr iz'u fufgr ugha gS u ,slk dksbZ iz'u bl vihy esa fufgr gksuk cgl ds nkSjku ;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k cryk gh lds gSa A

¶25

mijksDr foospu ls ;g vihy lkjghu gksus ls blh Lrj ij fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gksus ls ,rn~}kjk fujLr dh tkrh gSA

¶26

¼U;k0 izdk'k xqIrk½

¶27

_f"kds'k lksuh@ 41

Abdul Kayyum and Ors. v. Mohammad Yakub and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Kayyum and Ors. v. Mohammad Yakub and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwar Lal and Another Vs Hira Lal

Dena Bank and Ors. Vs Sh Shivprasad Soni and Anr.

State and Ors. Vs Shiv Temple and Ors.

Kadar Vs Nijamuddin and Ors.

Ram Gopal Vs Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Other

Om Prakash Vs State of Raj Thr Ziladhish Dausa and Anr.