Lrs of Asha Rani v. Sarswati Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the High Court dismissed the appeal against concurrent findings of lower courts in a civil eviction suit and rent recovery proceeding. The Court held no substantial question of law arose to interfere with fact-based determinations.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 136/2018
- Asha Rani W/o Late Mangatram (deceased) through Lrs:
- 1.1 Sandeep Sikri S/o Roshan Lal
- 1.2 Rahul Sikri S/o Roshan Lal
- Roshan Lal S/o Mangtram
- All B/c Arora, R/o 45-B-Block, Prem Nagar, Sri Ganganagar
----Appellants
Versus
- Sarswati Devi W/o Late Avinash Chand Arora
- Durgesh Nagpal S/o Late Avinash Chand Arora, R/o Lane No.02, Nagpal Colony, Sri Ganganagar
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether substantial question of law exists to entertain second appeal under Section 100 CPC against concurrent findings of lower courts.
Whether findings on ownership and tenancy are perverse or based on misreading of evidence warranting interference in second appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Asha Rani W/o Late Mangatram (deceased) through Lrs.
- appellant
Roshan Lal S/o Mangtram
- respondent
Sarswati Devi W/o Late Avinash Chand Arora
- respondent
Durgesh Nagpal S/o Late Avinash Chand Arora
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CSA/136/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court