Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Arvind Kumar Vs State — Rajasthan HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

Home
Rajasthan HC
2018
Arvind Kumar Vs StateArvind Kumar v. State

Dismissed

Arvind Kumar v. State

Rajasthan HC3 Oct 2018CRLR/55/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two criminal revision petitions were dismissed because the petitioner's counsel did not wish to press them before the Court.

What did the court decide?

None, as petitions were not pressed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Revision No. 55/2018

Arvind Kumar S/o Gurdasram Sharma, R/o Ward No. 6 Suratgarh District Sriganganagar.

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1256/2017

Bhupendra Singh S/o Krapal Singh, House No.3/22, Housing Board, Suratgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Arvind Kumar
petitioner
Bhupendra Singh
respondent
The State Of Rajasthan

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Rajasthan HC
Decided on: 3 Oct 2018 · October
Registered: 11 Jan 2018
Case no.: CRLR/55/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Vijay Bishnoi

Sandeep Vs State of Rajasthan
1 Oct 2018
Municipal Board Deedwana Vs the Addl. Divisional Commissioner
1 Oct 2018
Imran Vs State of Rajasthan
1 Oct 2018
Nathu Singh Vs State
3 Oct 2018

Cite this judgement

Arvind Kumar v. State, CRLR/55/2018 (RJ), decided on 3 October 2018.

The High Court of Rajasthan publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

VIJAY BISHNOI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

None, as petitions were not pressed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The criminal revision petitions were dismissed on the grounds that they were not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Shrimali Mr. D.S. Thind For Respondent(s) : Mr. L.R. Upadhyay, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Order

03/10/2018

Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press these criminal revision petitions. The same is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

Taruna

VIJAY BISHNOI

CNR

RJHC010118342018

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED

Revanti Vs State and Ors.

3 Oct 2018

Ummed Singh Vs State

3 Oct 2018