Criminal revision petition and stay petition were dismissed because the petitioner's counsel did not wish to press the petition.
Criminal revision petition and stay petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 318/2018
Nirmal Kumar Soni S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal, By Caste Soni, R/o Ward No.6, Bidasar, District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Arora For Respondent No.1 : Mr. L.R. Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Mahaveer Pareek
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
22/10/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this criminal revision petition.
In view of the above submission, this criminal revision petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Stay petition also stands dismissed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Abhishek Kumar S.No.27
Nirmal Kumar Soni
State Of Rajasthan
Mahaveer Prasad
VIJAY BISHNOI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
