Chhote Lal v. State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan dismissed two connected criminal miscellaneous petitions as they were not pressed by the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Petitions dismissed as not pressed with liberty to defend before trial court.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1667/2018
Chhote Lal Son Of Ram Lal , By Caste Meena, Resident Of 5/56, Mahi Colony, Banswara, The Then/presently Posted As Sr Clerk In The Office Of Executive Engineer, Mahi Pariyojana, Division-I, Banswara, District Banswara.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan
- Bharat Lal Son Of Shri Chhagan Lal Ji, Manager/officerIn-Charge , Panchayati Raj, Delhi, Village And Post Khamera, Police Station Khamera, District Banswara.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 944/2018
- Chhote Lal Son Of Ram Lal , By Caste Meena, Resident Of 5/56, Mahi Colony, Banswara, The Then/presently Posted As Sr Clerk In The Office Of Executive Engineer, Mahi Pariyojana, Division-I, Banswara, District Banswara.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chhote Lal Son Of Ram Lal
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Bharat Lal Son Of Shri Chhagan Lal Ji
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/944/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court