Disposed

Doctor Murari Lal and Anr. v. State of Raj and Anr.

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2018CRLMP/687/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition directing petitioners to first file a revision before the Court below within two weeks. The Registry was ordered to return documents. The revisional Court must decide on merits within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to file revision in lower court within two weeks; Registry to return documents; Lower Court to decide within three months.

Doctor Murari Lal and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURlE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misce!lawes%as (Petithpl) No. 687/2068

¶3

Doctor Murari La1 S/o Hanuman Prasad, B/c Khati , R/o Behror Road, Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh Haryana At Present Coordinator Dr. Murari Lal Hospital, Nizampur Mod, Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh Haryana.

¶4

Gajraj Singh S/o Narayan Singh, B/c Rajput , R/o Dhani
Thakran, Polic-e &t$i;bn " h%g , ' ;;. # Nangal ,< 2 $$* * ,-- Choudhary, District
Mahendraqa'ffj.'. ,", : t. &.; a " a $ ,+ 2 .:.r ..$? .sg' $M"L1444T
%&;$a>
r" 4." $?y--Petitioners
A & h, pgp a &.5,2d,
'%. $1"
%*p!,
% $ >$ Versus 5%"
X r
r? 5
1. &&ate Of Rajasthan Through Pp,
-Y
2. Umesh Kumar Nitharwal, Authorised 0
?; -e>vv * * ,>.
Appropriate uthoitfi~~@.~$kice Inspector, Police
-* 7; ,<"'" ',. x .I. ' ,.. "b
A',<< . "'4;1p.5k .+. ' 7". .,,! * t
.,; 4,, . o% .%:p 26, + , ., :. ..., . . . ?& ; s ?A ",-"j G $ +;. ----Responderits
,y::*. $.%..:.$%,,;-.,w ,& , .. :>&.. %$#,, ;$ ,,# ;&.& V7 W' f &P'? $y$@;;$
%'. .> 3 ,?-,,'."%,y': .. >" .'P&?' .. . a t ' &>" <'$, ":& h .<<-
i $-&+"-,,:."F "7% ;:* 2; ra t&:,
For Petitioner(s) , * .$.. .4. +? a&vp A r xi 4 &.. cP &a . $ r it*- .
:% '; -? 'ir" . E;;$g~~~f&j ,"P; : ,,p' [,- 5 - < % $;+i7 .&':
Fo Res po n d e nt(s) @ :;?==3y ".%)ir: %+ :.:&A -s a?e5c&(+ - e:z:?w :h-.,s , , w with
:f2:,f'a,fh,fi;@+ ,,n;;?2 I- I Bp P,::>$y2zd: ..* -, . .- Ka n d pa 1, A. G , C. ,L,
$8 ;6 ,, 4 -&P?' e
" ' ;.
HON'BLE MR. SINGH AHLUWALPA
: 7 F ., :.

¶5

i "> ...,,. .A
J # i a'"
$5 , , ? t k 8-.$
01/08/20ab8 $+@ ,:,;* & q$ ~~~~~$:i!,$ii~~~~k8
.< ,* ""+ ,'%$ &..A" ;;*..:i ,&>,&*s$$
.5$27$;~~11*''2a ,'!,* :, , I.,. 5 i4 8 '+
', : ;
Mr. G.S. Gill, I'd..- i appea?ing for the respondents,
<' *~3
-; " .$;g >4, >>,$ td$ * $ 1 ', *+ ' 1
has submitted that the order of cognizance passed by the Court
. ' ...-
below is revisable, hence, the petitioners, at the first instance,
should avail remedy of revisior't.

¶6

After hearing Id, counsel appearing for the parties, the present petition is disposed of, with the direction to the petitioners y '. 4 '<C$ to first avail remedy of revision. In case, revision petition is 'filed within two weeks from today, the same shal! be deemed to be within period of limitation.

¶7

,, ' !.I ' 3.1

¶8

The revisional Court beiow is directed to decide revision petition taking into consideration all arguments raised by the petitioners within a period of three months by passing a detailed speaking order dealing with the submissions raised by the petitioners, including regarding territorial jurisdiction of the Court to take cognizance of the offences.

¶9

The Registry is directed to return certified copies and h pi l 1 .,$ 'w- 8 C ..- . documents annexed-widh A +. % % ?.%* 3. %he?p"ie~&nt~@ki~n upon submission of & ," < ';+:-+$ .. .. 6 ,+ #LC ?* 1 &it" . , true attested ?,pies thereof by counsel for the betitioners. sr. ?. b.

¶10

(KANWAUIT SINGH AH'L-w,~:
.%f'-&< ,
8qT&w?
".y $&:
ashok

Doctor Murari Lal and Anr. v. State of Raj and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Doctor Murari Lal and Anr. v. State of Raj and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abida Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Tarachand Verma Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Smt Jadav Devi Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Brajmohan Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Umesh Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Bhagwati Devi Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.