The petitioner sought quashing of an FIR, but the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the trial court had accepted the investigating agency's negative final report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 164/2016
Harkesh S/o Shri Gordhan Lal Meena B/c Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Matlana, Tehsil Lalsot, Distt. Dausa (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nawal Singh Sikarwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakash Thakuriya, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Order
07/03/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the investigating agency has submitted a Final Report in negative form and the said report has been accepted by the trial Court. Therefore, present petition seeking quashing of FIR has been rendered infructuous.
As prayed, present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J
Manish/65
Harkesh S/o Shri Gordhan Lal Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Ramkesh Meena
Kanwalingt Singh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
