This order dismisses the second bail application of Baldev Bishnoi, who is lodged in jail. The bench, citing that the petitioner is a habitual offender, stated it was disinclined to grant any indulgence and thus nixed the petition.
The second bail application is nixed; bail is not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 7646/2018
Baldev Bishnoi S/o Shri Budhram Bishnoi, aged about 40 years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Shereka, Tehsil Tibbi, Distt. Hanumangarh. (Presently Lodged In Distt. Jail, Hanumangarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vipin Makkad. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Vyas, Add. Advocate General.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
20/09/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Advocate General on the second bail application.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is a habitual offender, I feel disinclined to grant indulgence to him.
Consequently, the second bail application is, hereby, nixed.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
a.asopa/-176
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner who is a declared habitual offender.
Baldev Bishnoi
State of Rajasthan
P.K. Lohra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
