Allowed

Hanuman Ram v. State

Rajasthan HC7 May 2018CRLMB/4041/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Jodhpur granted bail to petitioner Hanuman Ram arrested in connection with an FIR involving multiple IPC offences including rioting and assault. The court deemed it just and proper to release him on bail subject to a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail via personal bond of Rs. 80,000 with two sureties of Rs. 40,000 each on appearance before trial court.

Hanuman Ram Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4041 / 2018

¶3

Hanuman Ram Son of Shri Bhagwana Ram, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident of Manki, Tehsil Dhorimanna, District Barmer (Rajasthan) (At Present Lodged in District Jail, Barmer)

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. AS Rathore,PP For Complainant (s): Mr. J.R. Patel

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

07/05/2018

¶12

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 52/2018 of Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 325, 326, 354, 384, 307 & 459/149 of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and now he is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

From the perusal of the injury report of the Hariram, it is revealed that he has received simple injuries.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-4041/2018]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Hanuman Ram Son of Shri Bhagwana Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 52/2018 of Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer; he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.80,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.40,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.

¶21

TN/30

Hanuman Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanuman Ram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohanlal Vs State

Ashok Singh and Ors. Vs State

Rawta Ram Vs State

Manish Prasad Vs State

Mangi Lal Vs State

Smt Shyama Devi and Anr. Vs State