Pawan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner applied for bail but argued that no fresh evidence was required as prosecution and defence evidence were already recorded. Court dismissed application as not pressed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. V Bail No. 3674/2018
Pawan Son Of Sahab Ram , By Caste Nayak, Resident Of Mohan Mangaria, Hanumangarh Police Station, Hanumangarh, District Hanumangarh. Lodged In Central Jail, Bikaner
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Varun Arora For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
10/07/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the evidence of the prosecution as well as the defence has already been recorded, he does not want to press this fifth bail
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pawan Son Of Sahab Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/3674/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court