Allowed

Masra Ram and Ors. v. State

Rajasthan HC1 May 2018CRLMB/3501/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to three accused petitioners arrested under various IPC and special enactments. The court emphasized that the benefit of bail should be given given the length of the likely trial, dispensing with an expression of opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directs release of petitioners on bail in connection with FIR No.143/2018 upon executing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Masra Ram and Ors. Vs State — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 3501 / 2018

¶3

Masra Ram Son of Sona Ram, Aged About 38 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Village Dedwa, Sanchore Police Station, District Jalore.

¶4

Ganpat Lal Son of Narsi Ram, Aged About 22 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Village Dhanta, Sanchore Police Station, District Jalore.

¶5

Raichand Son of Chela Ram, Aged About 26 Years, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Village Virava, Chitalwana Police Station, District Jalore. (Lodged in Sub Jail, Bhinmal)

¶6

Versus State of Rajasthan ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. AS Rathore, PP

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Judgment / Order

¶8

01/05/2018

¶9

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.143/2018 of Police Station Sanchore, District Jalore, for the offence punishable under Sections 283, 147, 148, 149, 353, 332, 333, 452, 427, 307, 323 of IPC, under Section 3 of PDPP Act and under Section 8-B of National Highway Act. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶10

Counsel for the petitioners submit that the accusedpetitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take

¶11

(2 of 2)

¶12

[CRLMB-3501/2018]

¶13

sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Masra Ram Son of Sona Ram, (2) Ganpat Lal Son of Narsi Ram, (3) Raichand Son of Chela Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.143/2018 of Police Station Sanchore, District Jalore, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶17

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.

¶18

Hanuman/44

Masra Ram and Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Masra Ram and Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tej Singh Vs State

Bhagwat Singh Vs State

Deepa Ram Vs State

Jaswant and Anr. Vs State

Vikram Kumar Vs State

Smt.Manju Vs State