Bharat Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.K. Lohra dismissed the second bail application of the accused-petitioner, holding that no case for bail was made out given the alleged criminal delinquencies.
What did the court decide?
The second bail application is rejected.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 1508/2018
Bharat Ram S/o Shri Akharam, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Gorera Police Station, Shribalaji, District Nagour. (At Present Lodged At Jail Merta City)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through P.P
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: None present. : Mr. Arjun Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
27/11/2018
This is second bail application on behalf of accused-petitioner facing trial for offences punishable under Sections 376(2) IPC, 3/4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3(1)(xii) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act, in Sessions Case No.236/2016 pending before Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Merta.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner facing trial for offences under Sections 376 IPC and the POCSO Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bharat Ram S/o Shri Akharam
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
P.K. LOHRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/1508/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court