Allowed

Jeetendra Singh @ Jeetu v. State

Rajasthan HC8 Feb 2018CRLMB/1118/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner who was lodged in Sub Jail under the Nagaur LDA for passing false accounts. The order provides one-month remand for initial medical checkup and subsequent hearing before final disposal.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail; remand granted for one month for initial medical checkup and initial hearing; final hearing to be held after relist.

Jeetendra Singh @ Jeetu Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 1118 / 2018

¶3

Jeetendra Singh @ Jeetu S/o Murardan, By Caste- Charan, R/o Zod Ki Dhani Aaspura, P.S. Kuchamancity, District Nagaur (Raj.) (At Present Lodged in Sub Jail, Parbatsar)

----Petitioner

Versus

----Respondent

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh vfHk”ksd pkj.k] yksd vfHk;kstd Jh nhid pkS/kjh] ifjoknh dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh iznhi pkS/kjh] mifLFkrA

¶8

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh lanhi egrks

¶9

fu.kZ;

¶10

08@02@2018

¶11

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk MhMokuk] ftyk ukxkSj] esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 245@2014] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 148] 364,] 365] 368] 344] 346] 323] 468] 471 o 149 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3@25 vk;q) vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa mls tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶12

izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk }kjk izkFkhZ dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us iqjtksj fojks/k dj tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶13

lquk x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izkFkhZ ds leku vkjksiksa okys lgvfHk;qDrx.k izrkiflag] ijost] xqytkjh] eksguflag guqeku flag] vthr flag dh vksj ls

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-1118/2018]

¶16

izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= bl U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj fd, tk pqds gSaA bu lHkh rF;ksa dks ns[krs gq,] bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa izkFkhZ dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus ds mfpr vk/kkj i=koyh ij ekStwn gSaA

¶17

ekeys ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa esa izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fcuk fVIi.kh fd, ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns’k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ ftrsUnz flag mQZ thrw iqfyl Fkkuk MhMokuk] ftyk ukxkSj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 245@2014] ds ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds lUrks”kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq] ipkl gtkj :i, dk cU/ki= ,oa

¶18

iphl&iphl gtkj :i, dh nks izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs] rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k

¶19

tkosA

¶20

¼lanhi esgrk½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶21

,l-,u-yksgjk@87

Jeetendra Singh @ Jeetu v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeetendra Singh @ Jeetu v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases