Anil Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This bail application under Section 439 CrPC was allowed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The court directed the release of the petitioner on bond without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 10279/2018
Anil Kumar S/o Heat Ram, By caste Meghwal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 7 SGR Kunwa Wali Dhani, Police Station Suratgarh Sadar, District Sriganganagar. (Presently lodged in Central Jail, Sriganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta |
| For Respondent | : Mr. K.V. Vyas, Public Prosecutor |
| For Complainant | : Mr. L.K. Ramdhir |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
01/11/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the material on record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 439 CrPC in an FIR involving Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil Kumar
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10279/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court