The High Court rejected a criminal miscellaneous application filed by petitioners seeking modification or clarification of a previous order passed in their bail application, finding no basis for such intervention.
Criminal miscellaneous application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 145/2018
IN
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9155/2017
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P P
----Respondent
For complainant(s)/ : Mr. Bhrigu Sharma Applicant For State : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
14/03/2018
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Arti/128
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for modification or clarification of a previous interim order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. admits of any case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subhash Lalwani
Smt. Shakuntla Lalwani
Bhagwan Das
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
