The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an S.B. Criminal Leave to Appeal against the receipt and hearing of a writ petition for anticipatory bail. The court held that the High Court's decision to grant bail was within its powers, dismissing the State's challenge as having no merit.
The appeal was dismissed and the orders below were upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 267/2016
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
S.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 267/2016
State Of Rajasthan
Versus
Ramesh Meena
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vkj vkj xqtZjA
v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] lokbZ ek/kksiqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 59@2015 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 31-3-2016 ] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk izR;FkhZ jes'k ehuk dks vkjksfir vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 457] 376 lifBr /kkjk 511 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ls nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk is'k dh x;h gSA
vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk dFku jgk fd izdj.k esa ihfMrk dh lk{; ls vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vijk/k ds dze esa i;kZIr lk{; i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ihfMrk dh lk{; dks ek= bl dkj.k vfo'oluh; ekuk x;k fd ekSds ij ekStwn p'enhn xokgksa dh lk{; is'k ugha dh
S.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 267/2016
2
x;h gS tcfd vkjksfir vijk/k ds dze esa ihfMrk Lo;a dh lk{; i;kZIr gksus ds ckotwn Hkh v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us i z R;FkhZ dks nks"keqDr fd;k gSA vr% vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA izdj.k esa laiw.kZ rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; esa ih-MCY;w&7 ihfMrk ds c;kuksa esa vfHk;qDr ,oa ihfMrk ds e/; iwoZ ls jaft'k gksus dh Lohdr fLFkfr ,oa ?kVuk ds pkj fnu ckn bLrxklk izLrqr djus] /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ys[kc) c;kuksa] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o U;k;ky; esa gq, c;kuksa esa fojks/kkHkkl gksus ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vfHk;qDr jes'k ehuk dks vkjksfir vijk/k ls lansg dk ykHk nsdj nks"keqDr fd;s tkus esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ,slh dksbZ =qfV dkfjr ugha dh gS ftlls fd vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk ds dze esa vihy dh vuqefr iznku dh tkosA bu rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izFken"V;k vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus ds dksbZ vk/kkj ugha ik;s tkrs gSaA
ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ&jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
,e 'kekZ@11
mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la- 1 fn- 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk fgUnh esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court erred in granting anticipatory bail to the respondent in an offence under Section 457, 376 IPC by failing to record justifiable grounds as required by Article 226 of the Constit
Whether the grant of bail under Article 206 strictly violated the mandatory provisions of Article 223 regarding recording reasons.
Whether the decision to grant bail was a justifiable exercise of judicial discretion or a violation of statutory procedures.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
State Of Rajasthan
Ramesh Meena
H.K. Seervai
V.K. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
