Sunil Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench dismissed S.B. Criminal Appeal as not pressed despite SC/ST Act lacuna, granting liberty to file fresh appeal post-statement recording under Section 14-A(2).
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file fresh criminal appeal after recording prosecutrix statement.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 272 / 2018
Sunil Kumar Son of Onkarmal Mahajan, Aged About 26 Years, By Caste Mahajan, Resident of Gothaya Chhoti, Rajgarh Police Station, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu. (Lodged in District Jail, Churu)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreekant Verma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Awasthi,PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
20/03/2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow Criminal Appeal when not pressed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunil Kumar Son of Onkarmal Mahajan
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLAS/272/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court