Allowed

Roop Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Oct 2018CRLAS/1128/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act, setting aside the trial court's order rejecting bail. The appellant was directed to be released on bail subject to execution of a personal bond. The decision was made without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 25.9.2018 setting aside bail is quashed. Appellant may be released on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Roop Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1128/2018

¶3

Roop Singh S/o Shri Shiv Singh, Aged About 20 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Chadual, P.S. Kalandri, District Sirohi.

¶4

(At present lodged in District Jail, Sirohi)

----Appellant

Versus

State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Surendra Surana For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Rathi, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

01/10/2018

¶13

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellant being aggrieved with the order dated 25.9.2018 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Pali (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in Criminal Misc. (Bail) Case No.386/2018 (CIS No.386/2018) whereby, the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.

¶14

The appellant has been arrested in FIR No.102/2018 of Police Station Kalandri, Distt. Sirohi for the offences punishable under Sections 506(2), 501 IPC and Sections 66, 66A and 66E of the I.T. Act.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLAS-1128/2018]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer made on behalf of the appellant in this criminal appeal.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act.

¶19

Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and the order dated 25.9.2018 passed by the trial court in Criminal Misc. (Bail) Case No.386/2018 (CIS No.386/2018) is set aside. It is directed that appellant – Roop Singh son of Shri Shiv Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.102/2018 of Police Station Kalandri, Distt. Sirohi provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶21

ms rathore

Roop Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roop Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohmmed Salim @ Sanu @ Sonu @ Tindy Vs State of Rajasthan

Devilal Vs Chaman Singh and Ors.

Sanju Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep Vs State of Rajasthan

Municipal Board Deedwana Vs the Addl. Divisional Commissioner

Imran Vs State of Rajasthan