A restoration application regarding a civil second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No. 91 / 2014
In
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 724/2007
Tikam Singh @ Bhagirath Singh S/o Sher Singh B/c Rajput, Aged About 57 Years, Meharu Ka Khera, Teh. Malpura, Distt. Tonk
----Appellant/Defendant
Versus
1/1. Gori Shankar S/o Late Shri Mool Chand Swami B/c Bairagi Sadhu, Meharu Ka Khera, Teh. Malpura, Distt. Tonk
1/2. Nanda S/o Late Shri Mool Chand Swami B/c Bairagi Sadhu, Meharu Ka Khera, Teh. Malpura, Distt. Tonk
----Respondents
For Appellant (s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Bansal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order
09/01/2018
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant-
applicant even in the second round.
Therefore, the restoration application is dismissed in
default for non-prosecution.
(ALOK SHARMA)J.
Dk
Tikam Singh @ Bhagirath Singh
Gori Shankar
Nanda
Mohan Das
Alok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
