The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the restoration application for condonation of delay. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading the court to dismiss the applicatio.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 203/2018
in
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.329/2015
State Of Raj And Anr
----Petitioner
Versus
Murari Lal Sharma
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA
Order
19/04/2018
None present on behalf of the applicants even in the second round. Therefore, the application for condonation of delay is, dismissed.
Consequently, the restoration application stands dismissed.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
bairwa/38
State Of Raj
Murari Lal Sharma
Prakash Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
