J v. v N Ltd. v Arvind Refectories Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed two civil revision petitions challenging the Rajasthan High Court's order quashing an electricity board's tariff levy. The court held Section 25N of the ID Act does not apply automatically without mutual consent and neither party was aggrieved, making the challenge maintainable only if they were.
What the court decided
-1-
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
vkns'k
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 884/2001
- Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., having its Head Office at Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur through its Secretary
- Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., having its Head Office at Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur through the Recovery Officer-cum-Executive Engineer (O&M) Bhiwari, Distt. Alwar.
3.The Rajasthan State Electricity Board, through the successor company Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., having its Head Office at Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, through its Secretary.
….Petitioners/Non-Applicants
Versus
D.P. Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., F-357, RIICO Industries Area, Bhiwari, Distt. Alwar through Director Shri Subhodh Kumar.
...Non-Petitioner/Applicant
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 applies retrospectively to the parties or requires mutual consent.
Whether the levy of electricity tariff by the power board on the industrial units was a director in the revision petition or a separate industrial dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd.
- petitioner
Rajasthan State Electricity Board
- respondent
D.P. Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
Arvind Refactories Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/1005/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court