The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a stay application filed in connection with a writ petition. The court relied on the three-judge bench decision in Ganga Dudd Murarka vs. Kartik Chandra Das to find no force in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Stay Application No. 9602/2016
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10690 / 2016
M D Uttar Pradesh State & Anr.
----Petitioners
Versus
Navratan Choudhary
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Peush Nag
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order
29/01/2018
Heard counsel for the petitioner.
I find no force in the stay application in view of clear enunciation of law by a Three Judges Bench of Apex Court in the case of Ganga Dudd Murarka Versus Kartik Chandra Das reported in Law Suit (SC) 56.
Stay application is accordingly dismissed.
(ALOK SHARMA)J.
Dk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the stay application is sustainable in light of the Apex Court's decision in Ganga Dudd Murarka Versus Kartik Chandra Das.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ganga Dudd Murarka Versus Kartik Chandra DasRelied on¶15
Ganga Dudd Murarka Versus Kartik Chandra Das reported in Law Suit (SC) 56
M. D. Uttar Pradesh State & Anr.
Navratan Choudhary
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
