Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to counsel's informed plea of no instruction from appellants despite notice.
The appeal is thus, dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 472 / 2011
Appellants – Defendants No.2 to 4 are minor and represented through their natural guardian and mother Smt. Samaz Kanwar (appellant – defendant No.1)
All Residents of Mateshwari Colony, Rampur Chauraha, Udaipur.
----Appellants - Defendants
Versus
----Respondent - Plaintiff
----Respondents - Defendants
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rishabh Shrimali for Mr. Suresh Shrimali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Singh for Mr. Shambhoo Singh
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
14/05/2018
Learned counsel for the appellants informs that the appellants have not contacted him since filing of the appeal. He further informs that he has sent notice to the appellants by way of registered post acknowledgment due and the same has been refused by the noticee.
(2 of 2)
[CFA-472/2011]
In view of the aforesaid, he pleads no instruction.
The appeal is thus, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(DINESH MEHTA), J.
Himanshu/- 40
Smt. Samaz Kanwar Wd/o late Bhanwar Singh
Shankar Singh
Miss Pratika
Bharat Singh alias Shiv Singh
Rajkumari D/o late Bhanwar Singh
Jai Singh S/o Guman Singh
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
