The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed an appeal as abated because the appellant failed to take steps to substitute a legal representative of the respondent as per a peremptory order dated 15.05.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 138 / 2001
Laxmi Narain
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Srikrishan
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : None present
_____________________________________________________ JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order
28/05/2018
Despite peremptory order dated 15.05.2018, no step has been taken by the appellant for substitution of the legal representative of the respondent.
The appeal is therefore, dismissed as abated.
(DINESH MEHTA), J. Upendra/19
Laxmi Narain
Shri Srikrishan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
