In a bench at Jaipur, this contempt petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the matter was no longer pending before the executing authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 319/2018
Arti Jain D/o Shri Vimal Chand Jain, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 51/369, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ajatshatru Mina
For Respondent(s) : Mr.M.F. Baig, Mr.Ashish Sharma.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Order
14/03/2018
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present contempt petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(ALOK SHARMA),J
Himanshu/136
Arti Bain D/o Shri Vimal Chand Jain
D.B. Gupta
Smt. Manjula Verma
Shri Bhaskar A. Sawant
Dr. Radhey Shyam Garg
State Of Rajasthan
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
