Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application to pursue an alternative legal remedy. The High Court closed the proceedings with liberty to approach the appropriate legal authority.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ application to avail alternative legal remedy with liberty reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9066 / 2017
Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Nathi Lal, by Caste Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village-Barso, Post- Barso, PHC-Sewar, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
04/07/2017
After arguing the matter for some length, the learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application to avail the alternative legal remedy, in accordance with law.
The writ proceedings are closed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to avail of legal remedy in accordance with law.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
Pooja/50
Jagdish Prasad
State of Rajasthan
Union of India
VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
