Disposed

Parveen Jahan Sheikh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC21 Dec 2017CW/23617/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge bench dismissed the writ petition as academic, holding the controversy resolved per a Division Bench order in Firoj Arif, pending determination on probation pay scales and previous service benefits in other pending proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the writ application in terms of the order dated 21 March 2017 in Firoj Arif v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Parveen Jahan Sheikh Vs State of Raj and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 23617 / 2017

¶3

Parveen Jahan Sheikh D/o Shri Mohammed Shafi Sheikh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Near Masjid, Chota Takhta, Bada Kuwan, Tonk, Rajasthan

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶7

Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶8

The Director, Medical, Health and Family- Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Jain / Mr. A.K. Arora For Respondent(s) :

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶12

Order

¶13

21/12/2017

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Gopal Kumawat v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 2963/2007, decided on 29^th July, 2015.

¶15

It is further contended that so far as issue of benefit of previous service rendered by the petitioner on urgent temporary contract basis is concerned; the said issue is pending consideration before the Division Bench of this Court, at Principal

¶16

(2 of 3)

¶17

[CW-23617/2017]

¶18

Seat, Jodhpur, in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) Number 532/2016: The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal.

¶19

Further, a Coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ applications lead case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition Number 18268/2016: Firoj Arif v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 21^st March, 2017, observed thus:

¶20

“Consequently, the present bunch of fifty-four writ petitions are disposed of, by issuing following directions:-

¶21

a) That the petitioners during the period of probation are entitled to grant of regular pay scale instead of fixed remuneration as held by Division Bench of this court in the case of Gopal Kumawat vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2963/2007, decided on 29.7.2015, subject to decision of Supreme Court in the pending appeals, wherein validity of judgment rendered in Gopal Kumawat’s case (supra) is to be determined.

¶22

b) That in case the judgment rendered in the case of Gopal Kumawat’s case (supra) is set aside by the Supreme Court, the petitioners shall be dealt by the respondents State in the light of the judgment to be delivered by the Supreme Court, otherwise, the State of Rajasthan shall abide by the mandate of law laid in Gopal Kumawat’s case (supra) by the Division Bench of this Court.

¶23

c) That so far grant of benefit of previous service rendered by the petitioners on urgent temporary contract basis is concerned, the parties to the lis shall abide by the outcome of D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 532/2016, The State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal, pending before Division Bench at Principal Seat at Jodhpur.”

¶24

(3 of 3)

¶25

[CW-23617/2017]

¶26

Learned counsel further prayed that the instant writ application be also disposed of in terms of the order in the case of Firoj Arif (supra).

¶27

In view of the statement made; instant writ application stands disposed off in terms of the order dated 21^st March, 2017, in the case of Firoj Arif (supra), as extracted herein above.

¶28

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶29

SS/244

Parveen Jahan Sheikh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parveen Jahan Sheikh v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gallu Vs Smt Bardi

Ajayveer Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Pooja Devi and Ors. Vs Chajuram and Ors.

Santosh Swami Vs State Education Department Ors.

Avadh Bihari Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Hanumana Ram Vs State of Raj and Ors.