High Court disposed of a writ petition by directng State respondents to decide petitioners' representation within four weeks after receiving a representation accompanied by a copy of the Banne Khan order.
Petitioners directed to submit a representation; State directed to decide it within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22238 / 2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.N. Meena
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
(2 of 2)
[CW-22238/2017]
01/12/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised, in the instant writ application, stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Banne Khan: S.A.W. Number 763/2011, decided on 2nd August, 2011.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners in the backdrop of the adjudication in the case of Banne Khan (supra), within a time frame, which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Banne Khan (supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/89
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State respondents are directed to decide the representation of petitioners in light of the Banne Khan adjudication within a specified time.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Rajasthan Versus Banne KhanReferred¶22
State of Rajasthan Versus Banne Khan: S.A.W. Number 763/2011
Heera Lal Meena and others
State of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Department of Home
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
