The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a writ petition labeled as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel stated the relief had already been granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 214 / 2006
Om Prakash Bhumla, aged about 57 years, son of late Shri lakmi Narian Bhumla, resident of 1721, Sai Dham, Khazana, wale ka Rasta, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha
For Respondent(s) : .....................
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
08/05/2017
Counsel for the petitioner states that the relief has been granted and therefore the matter has been rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)J.
Anu/100
Om Prakash Bhumla
State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Education Department
Dy. Director(Primary Education), Education Department, Jaipur Division
Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Chaksu
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
