In a writ petition challenging an educational order, the court held that an alternative remedy exists. It directed the petitioner to file an appeal under Rule 22 of CCA Rule 1958 and dismissed the writ petition.
Petitioner directed to file appeal under Rule 22 of CCA Rule 1958; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21008 / 2017
Raj Kumar Yadav Son of Shri Hanuman Sahai Yadav, Resident of Village Lalgarh, Post Jalsu, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan
----Petitioner Applicant
Versus
----Non-Applicant-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment
08/12/2017
Alternate remedy exists.
Counsel for the petitioner may file an appeal as provided under Rule 22 of the CCA Rule, 1958 against the order of suspension of an appeal is filed, it is expected from the authorities to decide the appeal within a period of three months henceforth without being influenced by the dismissal of this present writ petition.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) J.
Sanjay Gaur/59
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the order of suspension of an appeal before allowing an alternative remedy to exhaust.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raj Kumar Yadav
State of Rajasthan
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
