The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a writ petition when counsel for the petitioner withdrew it by invoking the remedy under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise dispute before appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 194 / 2008
Dayal Ram
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhruv
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anuradha Upadhyay
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Judgment / Order
01/11/2017
Counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the writ petition in view of the availability of remedy under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise dispute before appropriate forum.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)J.
Anu/9
Dayal Ram
Union Of India
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
