Sashi Kant Bairwa Vs State Education Departmentors

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the Staterespondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame, which the petitioner is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶16

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents ventilating his grievances.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-10801/2016]

¶19

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶20

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ as well as stay application stand disposed off.

¶21

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶22

SS/244

Sashi Kant Bairwa v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sashi Kant Bairwa v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

O P Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Smt Geetu and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Nishant Heda Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Anita Meena Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Vijay Lal Ninama Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Omprakash Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan