Disposed

Dharampal Gurjar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC12 Jul 2017CW/10748/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order closed the writ proceedings against recruitment issues by directing the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation. The State was directed to decide it within six weeks by a reasoned order following a coordinate bench judgment.

What did the court decide?

Closed proceedings; directed to file comprehensive representation within two weeks; State directed to decide within six weeks by reasoned order.

Dharampal Gurjar Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10748 / 2017

¶3

Dharampal Gurjar S/o Shri Yadram Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Shyampur Post Gunti, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar Rajasthan

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through the Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department (Panchayati Raj), Government of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur

¶7

Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur

¶8

Director Elementary Education, Bikaner.

¶9

District Collector, Alwar

¶10

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma

¶13

Respondent(s) :

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶15

Order

¶16

12/07/2017

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

¶18

controversy, raised herein, stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate bench of this Court in SBCWP No.1032 of 2017: Sunita Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 24^th May, 2017, observing thus:

¶19

“Hence, the present bunch of writ petitions listed today is disposed of by issuing following directions:-

¶20

(a). That the State Government shall issue a circular regarding constitution of the committee within one

¶21

(2 of 3)

¶22

[CW-10748/2017]

¶23

week from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶24

(b). That from the date of selection of the candidate or within fifteen days from constitution of the committee, whichever is later, any candidate who had participated in the interview, is having grievance and is dissatisfied, may file a representation before the committee.

¶25

(c). That the said committee after looking into the record, shall decide the representation by passing a detailed reasoned speaking order.

¶26

(d). That copy of the order to be passed upon the representation shall be sent to the candidate through registered post.

¶27

(e). That if the candidate who has filed representation, is still aggrieved of the decision, he or she may, within one month from the date of receipt of registered post, take recourse to lawful remedy available to him/her in accordance with provisions of law.

¶28

(f). That for putting the candidates to notice who had participated in the selection process, this order and the circular so issued by the State Government shall be uploaded on the official website of the Rural Development & Panchayati Raj Department and the Education Department (Elementary). As a parting note, a direction is given to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) that all cases pertaining to recruitment of Gram Panchayat Sahayak, be listed upon submission of application by the concerned counsel.

¶29

A copy of this order under seal and signature of Court Master be handed over to Shri S.K. Gupta, learned AAG, for onward transmission and compliance.”

¶30

It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners in view

¶31

(3 of 3)

¶32

[CW-10748/2017]

¶33

of the directions, as extracted herein above, in the case of Sunita Sharma (supra), within a time frame, which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶34

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Sunita Sharma (supra).

¶35

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order in view of the directions, as extracted herein above, in the case of Sunita Sharma (supra), as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶36

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.

¶37

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶38

SS/279

Dharampal Gurjar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharampal Gurjar v. State of Raj and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam Khan Vs Nanak Chand Vashishth

Rishi Lal Chhabara Vs Prem Kumar Mehta

Ramlal Punia and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Poonam Khandelwal Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Yashwant Singh Vs M D Rural Industrial andANR

Pushpendra Vs State of Rajasthan through P P