Allowed

Sumitra and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2017CRLW/344/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court confirmed an interim protection order issued on 06.11.2015 and disposed of the criminal writ petition by directing respondents to continue providing life and liberty protection against apprehended unlawful actions by specific individuals.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to continue providing protection of life and liberty to the petitioners against unlawful action apprehended by petitioners from respondent Nos. 6 to 10; petition disposed of.

Sumitra and Anr. Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Writ No. 344 / 2015

¶3

Sumitra W/o Hariram D/o Parmeshwarlal Aged 18 years.

¶4

Hariram Katewa S/o Sitarm aged 22 years.

¶5

Both by caste Jat, resident of Kemri Ki Dhani, Tan Khirod, Tehsil Nawalgarh District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Justice, Govt. Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

Director General of Police Rajasthan Jaipur.

¶10

Superintendent of Police, Sikar District Sikar.

¶11

Superintendent of Police Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu

¶12

Station House Officer Police Station Laxmangarh, District Sikar.

¶13

Parmershwar lal S/o Manglaram

¶14

Sharwan Meel S/o Parmeshwarlal

¶15

Ganesh Meel s/o Parmeshwarlal

¶16

All resident of Kemri Ki Dhani, Tan Khirod, Tehsil Nawalgarh District Jhunjhunu

¶17

Rajendra Thalore S/o laxmanram r/o Jajod District sikar

¶18

Vidhyadhar Dhaka s/o Shripal, R/o Bhooma Bhada, Sikar.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hem Singh Rathore

¶21

Ms. Seema Chauhan

¶22

Mr. Piyush Rathore

¶23

For Respondent(s) : Mr. V. S. Godara, P. P.

¶24

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS

¶25

Order

¶26

01/08/2017

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that an interim order dated 06.11.2015 of protection passed by this Court,

¶28

(2 of 2)

¶29

[CRLW-344/2015]

¶30

may be confirmed and petition disposed of.

¶31

I have heard learned Public Prosecutor as well.

¶32

In view of all the facts and circumstances and considering all relevant aspects, it deems proper that present criminal writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to continue providing protection of life and liberty to the petitioners against any unlawful action apprehended by the petitioners from respondent Nos.6 to 10.

¶33

Accordingly, the Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms.

¶34

(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS),J.

¶35

Gourav/24

Sumitra and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumitra and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Shakuntala Devi Vs Irfan Khan and Ors.

Dilraj and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Saroj Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Lukman Khan Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Suresh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Asim Husain Allias Khatam Vs State of Rajasthan through P P